Newborn babies are the most vulnerable of all beings. Vulnerability says it all when it comes to a newborn infant. Children deserve the best medical treatment from the best form of medicine human intelligence can implement but what they get is governmental interference and neglect. Below we see the first information coming in that the radiation that the government is saying is safe and harmless and of very low concentration is already killing babies on the west coast of the United States wheredeathrates are spiking.
Who cares about the babies that die? Ourgovernmentcertainly doesn't! It is outrageous and tragic that our government and many of our doctors don't care. Certainly we will never see medical officials caring about the deaths ofinfantscaused by vaccines on a regular basis. The government's identity has grown to such beastly proportions these days that everyone who is not "them" is an enemy, even thebabies.
What do medical officials really care when a baby dies fromvaccinecomplications? What do FDA officials do to block out the guilt andpainof knowing that they caused a lifetime of suffering for a youngchildwhen they allow dentalmercuryamalgam (toxic waste dumps) to be put right in their mouths? Do they care about peoples'iodinedeficiencies that leave them more vulnerable to the radioactive iodine fromFukushima? Do they care about the wreck and ruin in millions of peoples' lives suffering from thetoxicityof fluoride deliberately put in the public's drinking water supplies?
And do you honestly think they are going to care about babies dying and fetuses being underweight from the radiationexposurecoming over the Pacific to the west coast of theUnited Statesand Canada? We know the radiation is there for it has been detected and reported on the inside pages of newspapers in small print that one would need a magnifying glass to read.
There now exists a new rule-of-thumb regarding the media: the less the media says about something the more dangerous it is. The thing that tells us we are in seriousdangeris the almost complete absence of anything in the papers about thedangerscoming from Fukushima. The news is so bad that they cannot and will not print anything about it.
But now we have very disturbing reports abouta35% spike in infant mortality in Northwest cities since the meltdown in Fukushima.Dr. Janette ShermanandJoseph Manganowrote:
"U.S. babies are dying at an increased rate. The recent CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report indicates that eight cities in the northwest U.S. (Boise ID,SeattleWA, Portland OR plus the northern California cities of Santa Cruz, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose and Berkeley) reported the following data ondeathsamong those younger than one year of age:
"4 weeks ending March 19,2011: 37 deaths (avg. 9.25 per week)
10 weeks ending May 28, 2011: 125 deaths (avg. 12.50 per week)"
"This amounts to an increase of 35% (the total for the entire U.S. rose about 2.3%), and is statistically significant. Offurther significanceis that those dates include the four weeks before and the ten weeks after the Fukushimanuclearpower plant disaster. In 2001 the infant mortality was 6.834 per 1000 live births, increasing to 6.845 in 2007. All years from 2002 to 2007 were higher than the 2001 rate."
The Most Vulnerable
Infants andpregnant womenare most at risk.
Doctors Alexey V. Yablokov, Vassily B. Nesterenko, and Alexey V. Nesterenko say, "Whenchildrenhave the same menu asadults, they get up to five times higher (radiation) dose burdens from locally produced foodstuffs because of their lower weight and more active processes of metabolism."
"It is well known thatwomenare more susceptible -- approximately twice as susceptible, or worse -- to radiation's harmful effects than men who get the same dose. Youngpeopleare more susceptible than old. Young children are perhaps ten times as susceptible to radiation's dangers as adults are, because their cells are dividing and establishing themselves. The cells of some organs will continue to divide; but cells such as neurons and heart muscle cells stop dividing at adulthood. Cancer can also get established at this early stage. Cancer usually requires a long sequence of cellchangesto occur -- often 10 or 12 or more changes in the cell DNA's structure will have to occur, which can take many years," writes Ace Hoffman.
Hoffman continues saying, "Infants are even more susceptible than young children. Newborns, preemies... immune-challenged... even more so. Since Fukushima, our babies are dying at a significantly increased rate on the west coast of the United States (seearticlebelow). Across the country deaths are up as well, though not as much (ibid). Fetuses vary from "infinitely" more susceptible to radiation's dangers, to thousands of times more when they are very small, to "merely" hundreds of times more as they grow, to whatever they are atbirth-- no one knows precisely."
You just imagine the masses wondering how any of this can be true. How can babies die from nuclear radiation that is supposedly thesafelow-level stuff that the government and media say could notharma fly. Well for those who are wondering, watch this most currentvideofrom Arnie Gundersen who said, "In April, the average person in Seattle breathed in 10 hot particles a day."
Video:CNN's John King interviews Arnie Gundersen about the Hot Particles discovered in Japan and the US.
Dr. Sherman was probably not surprised about the increased birth deaths because she knows what happened atChernobyl, having been the chief editor of the bookChernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and Nature, written by Drs. A. V. Yablokov, V. B., Nesterenko and A. V. Nesterenko, published by the New York Academy of Sciences in 2009. "Data fromChernobyl, which exploded 25 years ago, clearly shows increased numbers of sick and weaknewbornsand increased numbers of deaths in the unborn and newborns, especially soon after the meltdown. These occurred in Europe as well as the former Soviet Union. Similar findings are also seen in wildlife living in areas with increased radioactive fallout levels."
Protect the Children, What Are You Waiting For?
Should the public discover the true health costs of nuclear
pollution, a cry would rise from all parts of the world and people
would refuse to cooperate passively with their own death.
Dr. Rosalie Bertell
There are many alarming trends in pediatric care, not the least of which is increasing radiation exposure. It is now estimated that that the average child will get more than seven radiation scans by age 18 and this does not includedentalX-rays. Most alarming is the increasing use of CT scans, which entail far more radiation and can raise the risk forcancerin children. X-rays of the chest, hands and feet are the most common. Forty-two percent of children had at least one radiation procedure and 25 percent had two or more during the three-year study period. Eight percent of the children got at least one CT scan, and more than three percent of children got two or more.
What we can do to save our children after they have been exposed to radiation is the most important thing a parent can learn at this point in time. We must acquire this knowledgebeforewe or our children have been exposed, but now it's already too late for that for a great number of people in the northern hemisphere.
Heavy Metal and Particle Vulnerability
Children are more vulnerable to the dangers oftoxic chemicalsthan are adults, according to Herbert L. Needleman, M.D. and Philip J. Landrigan, M.D., authors ofRaising Children Toxic Free. According to a study released in October 2004, conducted by the University of North Carolina, 21 percent of women of childbearing age have mercury levels in their hair that exceeds federal health standards. That is up from eight percent in just four years using a recent CDC study as a reference point. Under United States guidelines, 79 percent of Inuvik women of childbearing age have unsafe levels of mercury. Earlier this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a directive warning women of childbearing age to eat no more than two meals or 12 ounces of seafood, including canned tuna, weekly.
The life period with the highest adaptability and vulnerability
toenvironmentalfactors: the period inside the womb.
Dr. Sandra Steingraber describes theparticular vulnerability of childrenwhen it comes to mercury poisoning:
"The placenta, which works well to bar pathogens from entering the womb, does a terrible job of keeping methylmercury out. In fact, the placenta actively pumps mercury into the fetal capillaries as though it were a precious molecule of calcium or iodine. This is why levels of mercury in thebloodof a newborn typically exceed those of its mother by 70 percent. When confronted with methylmercury, the placenta functions more like a magnifying glass than a barrier. Once inside the fetal blood supply, mercury is carried to the fetalbrainwhere it interferes with brain cell migration. Just as a spider can lower itself from the ceiling by reeling out a single strand of silk, a fetal brain cell moves from the center ofthe brainto the surface by rappelling along its own fiber. This process of brain cell migration begins in earnest during month four of pregnancy and continues after birth at least through the age of two. Methylmercury paralyzes migrating brain cells and thus interferes with their movement from center to surface. Methylmercury also halts cell division in the fetal brain by binding directly to neural chromosomes. The cerebellum -- center of balance and coordination -- is a special target of methylmercury. Prenatal exposures to methylmercury have also been linked to deficits in memory, learning, and attention span that persist into adolescence and appear irreversible. In short, human fetuses are more vulnerable than adults to the brain-addling powers of mercury for two immutable reasons: They receive a comparatively bigger exposure (because of the placenta's concentrating powers), and their brain cells need to move and multiply."
A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency biochemist, Kathryn Mahaffey, estimates thatone in six pregnant women in the United States had high enough blood mercury to damage her child, for a total of 630,000 U.S. newborns atrisk. This was the first study to calculate the numbers based on children's blood levels, not the mother's blood. The new formula showed that one in six pregnant women had mercury levels in their blood of at least 3.5 parts per billion, sufficient for levels in thefetusto reach or surpass theEPAsafety threshold of 5.8 parts per billion. In 1999-2000, the last year for which government data is available, this meant that 630,000 children were at risk instead of the original estimate of 320,000.
According to Dr. Sandra Steingraber, "The EPA has taken pains not to adopt the 630,000 figure as its official position. Calculated by EPA scientist Kathryn Mahaffey, these new estimates were published inEnvironmental Health Perspectives, April 2004.
Children are more vulnerable than adults to
oxidative stress due to their naturally low
glutathione levels from conception through infancy.
Erden-Inal 2003
More than 100 years ago Dr. Abraham Jacobi, the father of Americanpediatrics, recognized the importance of and need for age-appropriate pharmaceutical therapy when he wrote, "Pediatrics does not deal with miniature men and women with reduced doses and the same class of disease in smaller bodies, but... has its own independent range and horizon." Modern pediatrics has abandoned this wisdom as demonstrated by the fact that vaccines are not adjusted down to the bodyweight of infants.
For all the references, sources and more articles onradiationandchemical toxicityplease visitDr. Mark Sircus blog.
About the author:
About the author:
Mark A. Sircus, Ac., OMD, is director of the International Medical Veritas Association (IMVA)http://www.imva.info/.
Dr. Sircus was trained in acupuncture and oriental medicine at the Institute of Traditional Medicine in Sante Fe, N.M., and at the School of Traditional Medicine of New England in Boston. He served at the Central Public Hospital of Pochutla in Mexico, and was awarded the title of doctor of oriental medicine for his work. He was one of the first nationally certified acupuncturists in theUnited States. Dr. Sircus's IMVA is dedicated to unifying the various disciplines inmedicinewith the goal of creating a new dawn in healthcare.
He is particularly concerned about the effect vaccinations have on vulnerableinfantsand is identifying the common thread of manytoxicagents that are dramatically threatening present and future generations ofchildren. His book, The Terror of Pediatric Medicine, is a free e-book offered on his web site. Humane Pediatrics will be an e-book available early in2011and then quickly as possible put into print.
Dr. Sircus is a most prolific and courageous writer and one can read through hundreds of pages on his various web sites.
He has recently released a number of e-books including Winning the War Against Cancer, Survival Medicine for the 21st Century, Sodium Bicarbonate, Rich Man’s Poor Man’s Cancer Treatment, New Paradigms in Diabetic Care and Bringing Back the Universal Medicine: IODINE.
Dr. Sircus is a pioneer in the area of natural detoxification and chelation of toxic chemicals and heavy metals. He is also a champion of the medicinal value of minerals and seawater.
Transdermal Magnesium Therapy, his first published work, offers a stunning breakthrough in medicine, an entirely new way to supplementmagnesiumthat naturally increases DHEA levels, brings cellular magnesium levels up quickly, relieves pain, brings downbloodpressure and pushes cell physiology in a positive direction. Magnesium chloride delivered transdermally brings a quick release from a broad range of conditions. His second edition of Transdermal Magnesium Therapy will be out shortly. In addition he writes critically about the political and financial crises occurring around us.
source http://www.naturalnews.com/
Who cares about the babies that die? Ourgovernmentcertainly doesn't! It is outrageous and tragic that our government and many of our doctors don't care. Certainly we will never see medical officials caring about the deaths ofinfantscaused by vaccines on a regular basis. The government's identity has grown to such beastly proportions these days that everyone who is not "them" is an enemy, even thebabies.
What do medical officials really care when a baby dies fromvaccinecomplications? What do FDA officials do to block out the guilt andpainof knowing that they caused a lifetime of suffering for a youngchildwhen they allow dentalmercuryamalgam (toxic waste dumps) to be put right in their mouths? Do they care about peoples'iodinedeficiencies that leave them more vulnerable to the radioactive iodine fromFukushima? Do they care about the wreck and ruin in millions of peoples' lives suffering from thetoxicityof fluoride deliberately put in the public's drinking water supplies?
And do you honestly think they are going to care about babies dying and fetuses being underweight from the radiationexposurecoming over the Pacific to the west coast of theUnited Statesand Canada? We know the radiation is there for it has been detected and reported on the inside pages of newspapers in small print that one would need a magnifying glass to read.
There now exists a new rule-of-thumb regarding the media: the less the media says about something the more dangerous it is. The thing that tells us we are in seriousdangeris the almost complete absence of anything in the papers about thedangerscoming from Fukushima. The news is so bad that they cannot and will not print anything about it.
But now we have very disturbing reports abouta35% spike in infant mortality in Northwest cities since the meltdown in Fukushima.Dr. Janette ShermanandJoseph Manganowrote:
"U.S. babies are dying at an increased rate. The recent CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report indicates that eight cities in the northwest U.S. (Boise ID,SeattleWA, Portland OR plus the northern California cities of Santa Cruz, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose and Berkeley) reported the following data ondeathsamong those younger than one year of age:
"4 weeks ending March 19,2011: 37 deaths (avg. 9.25 per week)
10 weeks ending May 28, 2011: 125 deaths (avg. 12.50 per week)"
"This amounts to an increase of 35% (the total for the entire U.S. rose about 2.3%), and is statistically significant. Offurther significanceis that those dates include the four weeks before and the ten weeks after the Fukushimanuclearpower plant disaster. In 2001 the infant mortality was 6.834 per 1000 live births, increasing to 6.845 in 2007. All years from 2002 to 2007 were higher than the 2001 rate."
The Most Vulnerable
Infants andpregnant womenare most at risk.
Doctors Alexey V. Yablokov, Vassily B. Nesterenko, and Alexey V. Nesterenko say, "Whenchildrenhave the same menu asadults, they get up to five times higher (radiation) dose burdens from locally produced foodstuffs because of their lower weight and more active processes of metabolism."
"It is well known thatwomenare more susceptible -- approximately twice as susceptible, or worse -- to radiation's harmful effects than men who get the same dose. Youngpeopleare more susceptible than old. Young children are perhaps ten times as susceptible to radiation's dangers as adults are, because their cells are dividing and establishing themselves. The cells of some organs will continue to divide; but cells such as neurons and heart muscle cells stop dividing at adulthood. Cancer can also get established at this early stage. Cancer usually requires a long sequence of cellchangesto occur -- often 10 or 12 or more changes in the cell DNA's structure will have to occur, which can take many years," writes Ace Hoffman.
Hoffman continues saying, "Infants are even more susceptible than young children. Newborns, preemies... immune-challenged... even more so. Since Fukushima, our babies are dying at a significantly increased rate on the west coast of the United States (seearticlebelow). Across the country deaths are up as well, though not as much (ibid). Fetuses vary from "infinitely" more susceptible to radiation's dangers, to thousands of times more when they are very small, to "merely" hundreds of times more as they grow, to whatever they are atbirth-- no one knows precisely."
You just imagine the masses wondering how any of this can be true. How can babies die from nuclear radiation that is supposedly thesafelow-level stuff that the government and media say could notharma fly. Well for those who are wondering, watch this most currentvideofrom Arnie Gundersen who said, "In April, the average person in Seattle breathed in 10 hot particles a day."
Video:CNN's John King interviews Arnie Gundersen about the Hot Particles discovered in Japan and the US.
Dr. Sherman was probably not surprised about the increased birth deaths because she knows what happened atChernobyl, having been the chief editor of the bookChernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and Nature, written by Drs. A. V. Yablokov, V. B., Nesterenko and A. V. Nesterenko, published by the New York Academy of Sciences in 2009. "Data fromChernobyl, which exploded 25 years ago, clearly shows increased numbers of sick and weaknewbornsand increased numbers of deaths in the unborn and newborns, especially soon after the meltdown. These occurred in Europe as well as the former Soviet Union. Similar findings are also seen in wildlife living in areas with increased radioactive fallout levels."
Protect the Children, What Are You Waiting For?
Should the public discover the true health costs of nuclear
pollution, a cry would rise from all parts of the world and people
would refuse to cooperate passively with their own death.
Dr. Rosalie Bertell
There are many alarming trends in pediatric care, not the least of which is increasing radiation exposure. It is now estimated that that the average child will get more than seven radiation scans by age 18 and this does not includedentalX-rays. Most alarming is the increasing use of CT scans, which entail far more radiation and can raise the risk forcancerin children. X-rays of the chest, hands and feet are the most common. Forty-two percent of children had at least one radiation procedure and 25 percent had two or more during the three-year study period. Eight percent of the children got at least one CT scan, and more than three percent of children got two or more.
What we can do to save our children after they have been exposed to radiation is the most important thing a parent can learn at this point in time. We must acquire this knowledgebeforewe or our children have been exposed, but now it's already too late for that for a great number of people in the northern hemisphere.
Heavy Metal and Particle Vulnerability
Children are more vulnerable to the dangers oftoxic chemicalsthan are adults, according to Herbert L. Needleman, M.D. and Philip J. Landrigan, M.D., authors ofRaising Children Toxic Free. According to a study released in October 2004, conducted by the University of North Carolina, 21 percent of women of childbearing age have mercury levels in their hair that exceeds federal health standards. That is up from eight percent in just four years using a recent CDC study as a reference point. Under United States guidelines, 79 percent of Inuvik women of childbearing age have unsafe levels of mercury. Earlier this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a directive warning women of childbearing age to eat no more than two meals or 12 ounces of seafood, including canned tuna, weekly.
The life period with the highest adaptability and vulnerability
toenvironmentalfactors: the period inside the womb.
Dr. Sandra Steingraber describes theparticular vulnerability of childrenwhen it comes to mercury poisoning:
"The placenta, which works well to bar pathogens from entering the womb, does a terrible job of keeping methylmercury out. In fact, the placenta actively pumps mercury into the fetal capillaries as though it were a precious molecule of calcium or iodine. This is why levels of mercury in thebloodof a newborn typically exceed those of its mother by 70 percent. When confronted with methylmercury, the placenta functions more like a magnifying glass than a barrier. Once inside the fetal blood supply, mercury is carried to the fetalbrainwhere it interferes with brain cell migration. Just as a spider can lower itself from the ceiling by reeling out a single strand of silk, a fetal brain cell moves from the center ofthe brainto the surface by rappelling along its own fiber. This process of brain cell migration begins in earnest during month four of pregnancy and continues after birth at least through the age of two. Methylmercury paralyzes migrating brain cells and thus interferes with their movement from center to surface. Methylmercury also halts cell division in the fetal brain by binding directly to neural chromosomes. The cerebellum -- center of balance and coordination -- is a special target of methylmercury. Prenatal exposures to methylmercury have also been linked to deficits in memory, learning, and attention span that persist into adolescence and appear irreversible. In short, human fetuses are more vulnerable than adults to the brain-addling powers of mercury for two immutable reasons: They receive a comparatively bigger exposure (because of the placenta's concentrating powers), and their brain cells need to move and multiply."
A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency biochemist, Kathryn Mahaffey, estimates thatone in six pregnant women in the United States had high enough blood mercury to damage her child, for a total of 630,000 U.S. newborns atrisk. This was the first study to calculate the numbers based on children's blood levels, not the mother's blood. The new formula showed that one in six pregnant women had mercury levels in their blood of at least 3.5 parts per billion, sufficient for levels in thefetusto reach or surpass theEPAsafety threshold of 5.8 parts per billion. In 1999-2000, the last year for which government data is available, this meant that 630,000 children were at risk instead of the original estimate of 320,000.
According to Dr. Sandra Steingraber, "The EPA has taken pains not to adopt the 630,000 figure as its official position. Calculated by EPA scientist Kathryn Mahaffey, these new estimates were published inEnvironmental Health Perspectives, April 2004.
Children are more vulnerable than adults to
oxidative stress due to their naturally low
glutathione levels from conception through infancy.
Erden-Inal 2003
More than 100 years ago Dr. Abraham Jacobi, the father of Americanpediatrics, recognized the importance of and need for age-appropriate pharmaceutical therapy when he wrote, "Pediatrics does not deal with miniature men and women with reduced doses and the same class of disease in smaller bodies, but... has its own independent range and horizon." Modern pediatrics has abandoned this wisdom as demonstrated by the fact that vaccines are not adjusted down to the bodyweight of infants.
For all the references, sources and more articles onradiationandchemical toxicityplease visitDr. Mark Sircus blog.
About the author:
About the author:
Mark A. Sircus, Ac., OMD, is director of the International Medical Veritas Association (IMVA)http://www.imva.info/.
Dr. Sircus was trained in acupuncture and oriental medicine at the Institute of Traditional Medicine in Sante Fe, N.M., and at the School of Traditional Medicine of New England in Boston. He served at the Central Public Hospital of Pochutla in Mexico, and was awarded the title of doctor of oriental medicine for his work. He was one of the first nationally certified acupuncturists in theUnited States. Dr. Sircus's IMVA is dedicated to unifying the various disciplines inmedicinewith the goal of creating a new dawn in healthcare.
He is particularly concerned about the effect vaccinations have on vulnerableinfantsand is identifying the common thread of manytoxicagents that are dramatically threatening present and future generations ofchildren. His book, The Terror of Pediatric Medicine, is a free e-book offered on his web site. Humane Pediatrics will be an e-book available early in2011and then quickly as possible put into print.
Dr. Sircus is a most prolific and courageous writer and one can read through hundreds of pages on his various web sites.
He has recently released a number of e-books including Winning the War Against Cancer, Survival Medicine for the 21st Century, Sodium Bicarbonate, Rich Man’s Poor Man’s Cancer Treatment, New Paradigms in Diabetic Care and Bringing Back the Universal Medicine: IODINE.
Dr. Sircus is a pioneer in the area of natural detoxification and chelation of toxic chemicals and heavy metals. He is also a champion of the medicinal value of minerals and seawater.
Transdermal Magnesium Therapy, his first published work, offers a stunning breakthrough in medicine, an entirely new way to supplementmagnesiumthat naturally increases DHEA levels, brings cellular magnesium levels up quickly, relieves pain, brings downbloodpressure and pushes cell physiology in a positive direction. Magnesium chloride delivered transdermally brings a quick release from a broad range of conditions. His second edition of Transdermal Magnesium Therapy will be out shortly. In addition he writes critically about the political and financial crises occurring around us.
source http://www.naturalnews.com/
